=====
From agage@csee.usf.edu:
Maybe 30 fps was too fast, but I had to stop the thing to read the text.

=====
From davew@sheaarch.com:
I don't know what to say about this.

=====
From vansickl@erols.com:
This animation baffled me.  No, I didn't read the .txt file for an
explanation; that should never be necessary. (vansickl@erols.com)



=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
Wow, bizzare! I like it. The pink lamps are great. The red house is overly 
simple though. I don't know if it's supposed to be that way, but it is 
modeled far more simply than the beginning of the animation.
This will get a really high score for concept. 

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
The odd gizmo in the opening and the strange little fellow were good.  I like
his expression.  The rest of the modelling was simple but competent.  On the
other hand, good surrealism needs its own dream logic.  This was just senseless
as far as I can see.  The whole last part with the large red building could
have been omitted without  loss.  The bouncing poorly contrasted flickering
lettering was irritating, pointless and all but illegible.  It too could have
been left out.  This would have been better if you had focussed on the machine
and had it *do* something, however enigmatic, and if the little guy had had
more than a cameo.