=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Nice animation.  I like the robots movement, very convincing.  The concept
needed some twist or something to make it really captivating....

=====
From ldnbruce@flash.net:
Body bounce was to cyclical

=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Good concept, nice composition.  Motion was smooth and believable.  I did like
the camera
setup on the landing shot.  My main complaint was that the buildings didn't look
as realistic
as they should have.  I had an idea of what you were doing, and it was confirmed
by the text,
but a better city would have driven the point home solidly.  Overall high
marks.

=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
Try adding some streets to the city.  Additionally, the up-and-down motion of
the robot's body seems too large.  You might want to look at Neil Alexander's
"Mars Conquest" animation from the "gagets" round for a good example of a
walking robot.


=====
From file:
The leg movements are excellent, and the ufo approach looks fine. Maybe if the
camera had been low to the ground when the spider is walking over the city it's
scale would have been more obvious? I thought it was just a bunch of cubes
rather than a city.
Notable for modelling, lighting