===== From agage@csee.usf.edu: Very good work for a robot! ===== From PovRayGuy@aol.com: John. John. John. I don't know what to say. ===== From manorton@jps.net: Come on now. ===== From dlauer@optonline.net: Sorry Rosie, but TC was right. Perhaps if you learned to type with both hands, you could write more complex code. ;^| ===== From marlo.steed@uleth.ca: No concept behind the animation... but nice movement. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: WHERE'S THE SOURCE????????????????? ===== From ldnbruce@flash.net: EXTREMELY LAME ===== From wozzeck@club-internet.fr: LAME ===== From eallen@highway1.com: Lame. Very Lame. After second thought, it's OK. ===== From chipr@niestu.com: Rusty like it because he likes *you*. But calling it "lame" is a bit harsh, I think. Just simple. Nice smooth movement, though, and a cute tie-in to your other entry. ===== From mark.wagner17@gte.net: The only animation in the contest that was *created* by a robot! ===== From file: TC: Lame Boxer: Very Lame Tork:Way Lame ===== From file: Sorry rosie, maybe next time. Rusty and his friends are right. Ask John Van Sickle for a little help.