===== From evilsnack@hotmail.com: It's just a bunch of morphing. Not terribly interesting. ===== From jps6860@yahoo.com: An interesting idea, but artistically it is a bit boring. I would have been nice to have a few other elements in the scene to give each evolution some context. Even an image map in the background that faded into the next image would have been something to look at other than plain white. The framing of the last two objects (skyscraper and rocket) are a bit off. The columns and chimney are framed so they fill the frame from top to bottom. For the last two the tops stay touching the top of the frame but their bottoms stay at the middle of the frame. ===== From irtc_mail@yahoo.co.uk: A good idea to show the evolution of architecture, but I don't think the structures you have chosen quite fit the idea. Did chimneys evolve into skyscrapers? Did rockets evolve from skyscrapers? Perhaps morphing is not the best way of showing changes in buildings. Would a time-lapse style deconstruction/construction effect fit in better with the theme. The frames seem very large with only a small part of the image having anything on it. Having white objects against a white background is not very clear. I'm not sure what happens to the rocket at the end. It looks like it launches, then falls over and comes back down again. ===== From file: I like it. Nice interpretation of the subject. Something for the background would have been an improvement, but the clean look works.