=====
You know, the first one was OK.  After that it was really boring to see the same
thing 
10^1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
times.

=====
This stuff is hardly worth to be rendered once!
What a waste of time and money to be forced to load the same ugly scene seven
times.
Too bad that there's no way to give less than one point - a negative value would
have been appropriate.

Sorry, but I'm really angry about this kind of behaviour.

Bye,
   Ingo

=====
Penalty for boorish advantage-taking of reviewers' time.

=====

hors sujet
=====
You know...
The first one or two of these were very cool, but enough is enough!
=====
I'm getting really tired of this same image. Don't you two architectural
students have any more imagination than this?

=====
Repetition does not improve the image.


=====

I've already rated one.

=====
7 fois la meme image !?

=====
Au lieu d'envoyer six images legerement differentes de la meme scene, il
vaudrait
mieux selectionner la meilleure des six et n'envoyer que celle-la.  Meme si les
images sont bien, le fait que la meme scene soit presente en plusieurs
exemplaires
doit avoir irrite pas mal de juges dans cette competition.  C'est dommage de
perdre
toutes ces chances ainsi.  Ah, au fait... des commentaires en anglais auraient
ete
les bienvenus, vu que l'anglais est la langue utilisee dans cette competition.
Simple question de courtoisie vis-a-vis des juges.  Pensez-y la prochaine fois.

=====

enough already!!!


=====
I think 7 versions of the same picture (which isn't all that great) is 
overkill (and annoying).

=====
Only voting on one picture.

=====
It's a cute idea, but one image would have been enough.

=====
doctor, i have this strange feeling of deja vu

=====
"Call up MapQuest and find us a way out of here!"