=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Okay, I'll bite--how did you do it?

=====
From sroberts@learn.senecac.on.ca:
Intriguing image!  I'm guessing that part of your secret is that it's rendered
from INSIDE a CSG object of some kind, possibly looking towards a corner or
edge, and what we're seeing is both the inner reflections and a wavy plane
outside???

=====
From jay@map.com:
I'm not sure *how* you made that.  Looks like a pyramid, but that doesn't seem
to explain quite all the reflections and odd shapes there.

=====
From cgallego@nordnet.fr:

Too 'carpet-smoking' for me, sorry :^)
http://home.nordnet.fr/~cgallego


=====
From richmiller@hotmail.com:
Great looking image, but hard to tell much about its technical or conceptual
merit without a description of those processes for you! Neat image.

=====
From tholal@bga.com:
Trippy, man!

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
Help! I'm incased in glass!

=====
From klynn@minn.net:

I give up, how?!
=====
From tlyons@gnn.com:
I find the best renerings come from "unexpected" results...and then go with
them!

=====
From 93semeno@scar.utoronto.ca:
Whatever.

=====
From tiger@mgl.ca:
No idea. How did you do it?
This image is really quite good for its simplicity.


=====
From mickmcm@indigo.ie:
Lots of movement here, which is nice to see in raytracing -- too many pictures
(including my own!) are far too static.


=====
From mjhammel@emass.com:
Its not bad, but you should keep in mind that images like this don't
display well on 8bit displays (like I'm using).  True, judges *should*
have better displays than that, but here at work its the best we've got.
The problem is that range of change in colors is small along edges of
the glass, so I lose some of the detail in the dithered view that I
have.  Other than that its quiet artistic.

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
A little too dull.


=====
From rea@st-and.ac.uk:
Excellent - I love simplicity in glass modelling - the glass does it all
itself!   I wonder what some more colour would do to this...

=====
From jmills@stic.net:
I'm diggin' it... :)

=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
Weird

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Looks very interesting, I kinda like it. Not overloaded with objects, but
nice effects achieved by very simple methods.

=====
From uvasst00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Too abstract, and a little too busy. Not very interesting.

=====
From ptdawson@voicenet.com:
This is completely abstract... that's good! I like it!

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
Very crystalline and abstract. And it's -not- another wineglass. :) 

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
It reminds me of an Andrew Pollack. :)


From web_user@173-127-214.ipt.aol.com:
Notable for originality