=====
From jay@map.com:
It's kind of hard to tell that the stained glass window is a window, not another
painting on the wall.  Yes, the light from the window shines on the desktop,
but it's too flush with the wall.


=====
From cgallego@nordnet.fr:

Nice glass texture...
Be carefull with scene croping...

http://home.nordnet.fr/~cgallego


=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
the objects don't "fit" well together...  they all look good, but the scene
isn't
appealing...  I would have liked to see close-ups of some of the individual
objects (snowman, hourglass, etc...)

=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
   You did the painting on the wall by hand eh? Not too bad. ;)

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
A nice image. The arwork in the background (left image) is cheesy, but I always
vote for more detail, even if the detail added is slighly goofy. Kudos. Much
better than a plain backgound. Everything else is very nice, especially the
polished surface, which reflects the goofy image nicely (good use of color)


=====
From danclegg@uniserve.com:
Squish.

=====
From mbrown@spry.com:
Just a simple desk? You have a gift of understatement. Its the most
photorealistic image i have seen down with povray. The only detraction
from the effect is the simple painting of the castle. But bravo! none the less.

=====
From rea@st-and.ac.uk:
As far as `Glass things on a desk' goes, you have managed that fine.   I
would prefer more thought as to what makes an image artistic though.

=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
Looks great!

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
Normally I might gripe about such heavy use of scanned artwork; but the glass
stuff on the desk interacts really well with the paintings. Very
photorealistic.