=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Wish I could have seen it better.

=====
From sroberts@learn.senecac.on.ca:
Having seen this kind of thermometer before, I have to admit I wish you'd used a
lower angle;
one of the charms of these old thermometers is how lovely they are (especially
when compared with the nasty
modern mercury ones used now).  Much of your detail is lost by the fact that we
can only see distorted
refractions of the interior "balloons".  What I can make out looks very nicely
detailed.

=====
From cgallego@nordnet.fr:

Good idea... It's good that you explain what it is !!!
http://home.nordnet.fr/~cgallego



=====
From MMandl@aol.com:
I would have like to have seen this from a different angle.

=====
From richmiller@hotmail.com:
Liked the concept; where did you find the design? I couldn't find one I liked
when I was selecting an idea... :)

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
they sell these at the mall....  I'd rather have seen a side view though.

=====
From tlyons@gnn.com:
hmmm hard to tell what it was without the description...maby another angle?

=====
From ansellaa@acc.wuacc.edu:
It looks to me as if there is a genie peering out from the thermometer.

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
I like it. An interesting image.


=====
From rea@st-and.ac.uk:
Seeing the text-file really helped - before I knew what to look for I just
saw a vaguely phallic object!   Whilst the camera angle gives good refraction,
I would recommend a more understandable one :)   Very nice background texture.

=====
From jmills@stic.net:
Wow! I could go blind looking at this! :)

=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
Oh, I thought it was a condom... ;)

=====
From ptdawson@voicenet.com:
The blue background is fantastic!

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
Interesting. Good thing you explain what it is in the text file, 'cause it
looks distractingly like a big glass condom.


From web_user@tonyv.aztec.co.za:
Notable for lighting