=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Cool concept, good modeling and texturing.  I like the worn spots on the wall
and the carving on the desk.

=====
From mmandl@aol.com:
All the images have the same color value.

=====
From jsaxton@folio.com:

Overall pretty interesting. I think that something could have been done to
increase the sense of depth in the picture. Some focal blur, perhaps?
=====
From bbowen@cswnet.com:
That's a really neat trick with the books.

=====
From xeo@sprynet.com:
very good modeling. I especially like the marbles

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Great job.


=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
I like the chalkboards and the letters in the desk.

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
My eyes (as was the case when I was in school) were immediately drawn to the
window...

=====
From tlyons@gnn.com:

a little bit dark in spots....
=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Wood textures look uniformly bland.
Creative use of the "CSG pitfall", though.

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Interesting technique for creating titles!  Nice attention to the little
details, too (like the bite-marks on the pen).

=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
I liked the detailing of things like the scratches in the desk, holes in the
plaster, etc.  Using the
CSG problem as a feature is a very cool idea.

=====
From jlb36@cornell.edu:
Very nice work.  The chipped paint is a nice touch on the wall, as is the dunce
cap and "portrait."

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice modelling and composition, but I disagree with colors (too ambient?)
Jaime (jaime@ctav.es)

=====
From marvil@algonet.se:
Good choice of colours! They're not too many or too saturated.

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
Quibble: Pen and ink but no paper?  Can't see anything else to add or to
criticise though.