=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Nice schoolhouse.  The grass is a loss--way too regular.  The flowers look
quite nice, as do the trees.

=====
From mmandl@aol.com:
The lighting needs improvement, everythis is the same value and you need more
contrast. Nice modeling!

=====
From ucoakc00@mcl.ucsb.edu:
Wow, those flowers are really wacky.


=====
From amarok@geocities.com:
The flowers are great, but the grass would have looked so much better if you 
had used anti-aliasing.

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
I like the textured flower petals.  The grass looks odd though.

=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
   Wow. That grass just kills the entire picture. Please consider changing it.

=====
From tlyons@gnn.com:

to cutt and past looking :-(
=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Everything seems to have at least two shadows.  How many suns 
are in your Washington sky?

=====
From no13@ozemail.com.au:
The image was light too storngly for my liking. Otherwise well done.

=====
From jlb36@cornell.edu:
You could try a hieght field for the grass.  I recently saw someone do a very
convincing lawn with a tiled hieghtfield.  The flowers and trees also looke 
very good.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice, but grass looks like a carpet and sun is too bright and white.

Jaime (jaime@ctav.es)