=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Excellant image!  Great concept and a good follow-through on it.  Nice
texturing, too...

=====
From jroy@internauts.ca:
Bravo, vraiment tres bien.

=====
From klynn@minn.net:
Love the paint tube

=====
From kazemir@pde.com:
I like the tube of paint, and the glass jar (even though the jar has a funny
shape to it, it looks very real).
I would have liked to see more details on the brissles of the paint brushes, and
I might have made the falcon a lot bigger as the center of the image.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice modelling with Spatch. Nice composition too!

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Excellent use of bezier patches.  The paint tube is outstanding.
The photos have too much thickness -- they look like slabs of plastic.
Nice woodgrain, but wrong orientation: shouldn't it be turned sideways?
I especially like the pencil holder.  The paper clips and paint brushes need
work.



=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
Nice picture with good lighting. Maybe the tip of the brushes should be
reworked.

=====
From MMandl@aol.com:
You did a really nice job!


=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Excellent image, Some unnatural bendings in the airbrush hose, though.
I especially like the color tube and the Hornet model.
The colour texturing of the dye coming out of the tube seems unnatural.
The brush tips seem to be solid (completely soiled with hardened colour?)

=====
From i_emackay@mountains.net.au:
Good Work. I think the components might have been arranged a bit better and a
different camera angle could improve the effect.

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
Great! Great models, good textures, cool idea.
Just a couple of thoughts: you could have made the table up of several logs,
in stead of just using one large piece, and the polaroids are a bit thicker
than
polaroids usually are. Great work, though.

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
I like the scene. <smile> Umm.. things that need work: 1) The bristle area of 
the brushes. 2) The rubber tube on the air brush has too much phong/specular.
3) The poloroids seem too thick. 4) The reflections of the poloroids and the 
paper on the wood surface looks too bright to me. 
I really like the idea of using the same model in wireframe and solid with a 
transparent gradient color pattern. I only wish the model could een made
larger.
I know that would have taken away from the other elements in the scene, and the
model may lack the detail to live up to such a close examination with the two 
overlaying models. But that doesn't stop me wishing. :{)

=====
From ptdawson@voicenet.com:
Great scene, looks exactly like a photograph. Hooray for sPatch,
and many thanks for your tutorials, too.

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
Wow.
I expect everyone's said the Falcon is backwards :-) .


=====
From web_user@flex058.dijkgraaf.wau.nl:
Maybe too much of a still life, this is not really a snapshot but a carefully
arranged set-up, which takes the dynamics away. The wood is brilliant - the way
the reflection breaks up is fantastic! Your paint-tube looks very good, as does
your glass 'cup' - the way the pencil and the pen are placed in it is very
good. Lighting looks very good, but as said, I think the scene is to static.


=====
From web_user@px1.syd.aone.net.au:
nice enough...a bit crawly!
Notable for modelling


=====
From r@dialup83.webbernet.net>:
Good trick with the falcon.  Relative size of objects needs work.


=====
From r@cmxlviii.dyn.sci.fi>:
A brilliant scene.Love it all---Hope ya win  :)
Notable for originality, composition, textures, modelling