=====
From jmg@gte.net:
uh...the name is a little big.

=====
From jroy@internauts.ca:
I would like to figure out what your image is ...
Is it abstract art of some kind ?

=====
From kazemir@pde.com:
I would have liked to seen a description/interpretation from you.  Although and
interesting image, I am unsure how this relates to the topic.

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
SIGNATURE IS TOO LARGE!!!

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Well, I must believe you have rendered it, but... why?

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
The text is a little too big.  Actually, it's way too big.
How was the rest of the image created?  It looks like a twisted paper cutout.

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
I don't doubt this is about art, but a bit of explaination would have been VERY
helpful.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Very interesting image, I wonder how it was done. Please think about adding
the "HOW THE IMAGE WAS CREATED"-section next time.

=====
From pgrooby@trimble.co.nz:
Really hard to judge this as you don't say how it was done.

=====
From i_emackay@mountains.net.au:
I couldn't understand this picture. Also large writing of author's name on
picture focused attention on name rather than the work itself.

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
This one is... special. It doesn't look ray-traced
at all. Very interesting.

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
I have no idea what this may have to do with the theme of Arts _and_
Entertainment.
Maybe if you'd included some kind of explanation in your text file, I could
have
seen where you were coming from on this. Nice image though. :{)

=====
From msfl.bf@fasonet.bf:
certainly a high artistic merit, but I would have liked to know how you did
this, for I havn't got a clue. Spending a bit more time on the text file would 
have been a good idea.

=====
From ptdawson@voicenet.com:
An Amiga user - cool! The technical score would be higher if you
had included some details in your text file. Looks great, though!

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
Duh... I don't know what this is.  Is it the path a dancer's moved through?


=====
From web_user@flex058.dijkgraaf.wau.nl:
Well.. euhmm. I think it's.. art? When you look at it more closely, you see some
nice patterns, but overviewing the entire image it looks like a, uhmm.. mess.


=====
From r@dialup83.webbernet.net>:
Pretty.  The obtrusive sig detracts a lot.