=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Good concept.  Your modelling needs some work - things look a bit too stiff or
geometrically precise.
=====
From agage@mines.edu:
I know it took 17 hours already, but a higher level of AA would sharpen the
shadows and the shape of the palette.

=====
From bill.marrs@pureatria.com:
The hand looks like is was modelled well, but the lighting doesn't highlight
it.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
If sunlight from outside the window is the only light source, then many parts of
this scene should be in deep shadow.  But the hand, for example, is quite
bright.  Try turning down the "ambient" value for the objects in this scene for
a more realistic look.

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
Mixed feelings: nice things like the blob of red paint or the idea to change
wood textures from a board to another. Things that could really be improved
like the sky (very blue) or the walls.

=====
From dick@buckosoft.com:
A bit more in the text file could have increased the score of this nice
picture.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Please use antialiasing; it would vastly improve image quality.
Also some more interesting textures might help.

=====
From i_emackay@mountains.net.au:
Idea is fair enough but the objects lack a sense of "solidity". Experiment with
lighting and texture. The window/sky is too stark.

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
I think that use of radiosity would have done a
lot to this image. 

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
I think I would have liked your image more if you'd added more detail to the 
textures, and rendered it with anti-aliasing turned on.
The image _does_ have potential though. :{)

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
I like the lighting.