=====
From jknepley@nyx.net:
The lighting and composition imples that this is not the final output of a raytracer.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:

Nicely modelled!  The only weakness is lack of a scene... it
is just one modelled object.    Unfortunately it really doesn't
stress engineering at all -- it is more a demonstration of design.


=====
From castlewrks@aol.com:
"Everything is there, the engine, all the interior, spare wheel etc"... 
Where? I can't see any of this stuff!
=====
From sonya_roberts@geocities.com:
Nicely modelled.  Has a real "car advertisement" feel to it, too.

=====
From beliaev@utu.fi:
I thought this round started January 1998.

=====
From daves@wkpowerlink.com:
Is this one, single rendered scene, or three scenes rendered seperately and pasted together?
=====
From chipr@niestu.com:
Pretty image, excellent modeling, though a bit sterile.  Nice concept--I like
the Viper, too.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Just a few rough edges here and there.

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
Would have preferred to have seen the car set in a proper setting, rather than
set like a magazine setting.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
A professional looking image.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
quite impressive image, but a little more anti-aliasing would have done well.
I just hope you put all three car objects into one scene and rendered it as such,
otherwise pasting the images together afterwards constitutes illegal post-
processing!

=====
From lpurple@netcom.com:
Great modelling job. The scene is kind of dark, though; and could
use a more interesting background texture.


=====
From r@dial-up42.webbernet.net>:
Pretty good modelling.  The textures on the taillights, tailpipe and wheels need tweaking.  Some nasty artifacts along the door line.  Where is the door handle?  Layout is more ad than art, doesn't really say anything.


=====
From r@bowerbird.cc.uq.edu.au>:
Notable for modelling, composition, textures