===== From cmorack@relex.com: Think I saw this on about 9000 movie box covers in the 1980's. ===== From jaime@ctav.es: Nice point of view! ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: Very nice composition. Good mood. Technical merit goes down, though, since most of the scene was made with ready-made models and include files. ===== From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu: Sorry, but most of the image is the street, and the rest is not really eye grabbing. ===== From rbjorn@algonet.se: Can_t give you any technical scores, you didn_t do anything yourself... ===== From kefriber@online.no: Stunning,,,the 'thing' that draw my rating for this picture down is that the 'main' features (the man & bike) was 'shortcut-made' - but all in all a fab. pic !! ===== From dormammu@erols.com: Most the work seems to be done with INC files, which deducts from your score slightly. Other than that, it's a nice picture. ===== From bill@apocalypse.org: Very good for the theme. This picture stands out. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: Dramatic! ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Good use of other people's stuff, but how much is your own? What's the reason for the downward camera angle? The bottom half of the image is featureless... ===== From djconnel@flash.net: Nicely done, and an interesting camera angle. However, it is a downloaded bike and a downloaded city.... not much original technique. The texturing is decently done, and the flare a nice touch. ===== From no13@ozemail.com.au: A little too much of the foreground (raod) showing. Seams to make the image a little unbalanced. Other than that excellent. ===== From econoltd@thezone.net: Good choice for the camera angle, but the unfinished look of the face contrasts sharply with the rest of the detail. Possible add more shadow around the face area? ===== From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net: Nice scene. Background is good. City.inc looks promising. Street is too empty. This comment by clem@dhol.com.