===== From cyber.mage@mailexcite.com: Nice figures, but sick idea! ===== From agage@mines.edu: I knew there would be at least one of these this round... A bit tasteless, I have to say, at least for a public competition. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Scored you low on concept. Perhaps full view of genatalia would have been tolerated had your work had a more clear message of some sort about sexual practice. But the vagueness and silly pun make it seem merely pornographic. ===== From jaime@ctav.es: I'm not offended! Thanks for a bit of fun! Don't take seriously other posibly bad comments... ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: Jag gillar iden, och modellerna ar ganska valgjorda, men Profilpaketet ser valdigt stort ut... ===== From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu: You seriously submitted this? I admire your courage. You got all 1's from me, but I admire your courage. ===== From sanna@censa3.polito.it: An "interesting" interpretation of theme ===== From kefriber@online.no: We scandinavians DO rock - right ? *lol* (Men den der profil-pakken s_ 'litt' stor ut - eller ?) ;-) As you can see from my vote you've scored MAX on the originality, but I've moderated my voting on the artistic/technical due to the simplicity of the surroundings, and the sheet looks kinda weird... You got me laughing though,,,,cewl - keep on rockin ! ===== From dormammu@erols.com: The humans look waaaay too stiff and unreal. More background would've been better. (ie, night stand, table, lamp, whatever.) ===== From karl@pemail.net: Looks like the revenge of the blow-up dolls. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: Words fail us! ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Certain areas of the image seem strangely blurry -- why? No shadows. Looks like a scanline, not raytraced. ===== From djconnel@flash.net: Uhhhh.... The guy looks like an inflatable dummy. The sheets could use some work.. The female is nicely modelled. The concept is a matter of taste -- it is on topic, but there's nothing really special about it. The "AIDS" message seems like a weak attempt to avoid offending people. ===== From cfusner@enter.net: Must have been quite a night. From the positioning and facial expression it looks like she killed him. ===== From r@client876c.globalnet.co.uk: Sadly not even erotic. ===== From r@207.232.193.166: You perv. This contest should never have even allowed this entrant. (Kinda interesting, though) Notable for modelling, lighting ===== From r@du206-1.ppp.algonet.se: Message from author: ===== From r@du206-1.ppp.algonet.se: Message from author: I must say I can_t really understand the fuzz about this picture... You don_t see any intime body-parts! And I thought that we all are so familiar with AIDS that we could joke about it... Jesus, they_re even using condoms! (Look at the condoms package beside them...) This could by all means be a picture for an Anti-Aids-campaign!!! I know that I will get deducts for this, and perhaps my other picture will suffer as well, but I don_t care!!! This is a competition mainly for POV-users, and this has become very clear for me... ===== From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net: A nice model with a lame background is a mistake. When you establish a certain level of detail in one part of the pic, you need to maintain it. Making the man hairless was a bit of a copout. Marginal for topic. Your human proportions are better here than in your other image. The shoulders don't connect quite right. Your modelling shows promise. If you learn to think a bit more about composition and a bit less about sexual frustration, you have considerable potential. This comment by clem@dhol.com.