=====
From cmorack@relex.com:

It's too bad you had to submit more than 1 image.. I liked this one better than
the first. But it gets 1's across the board.
=====
From cyber.mage@mailexcite.com:
Another creative title! 8)

=====
From ewgr@abaddon.globalnet.co.uk:
I have come to the conclusion this artist is merely using the competition to
advertise...

=====
From agage@mines.edu:
See my comments regarding the other version of this model.  Lighting,
texturing, and modeling are superb; if I had some kind of clue how it was
done, I might be inclined to give a better score.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
I rated you very low on originality because someone submitted almost exactly the
same thing!
=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
It seems very off-topic to me, and there's nothing in the text file to justify
the theme. Sorry.

=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
   Hey, same image, different view. These always score highly.

=====
From dormammu@erols.com:
I couldn't tell how this was a night pic.. and the fact that you didn't give
a comphrensive txt file only worsened your score.  Sure, this could be at night
in a building, I guess ... but how do I know that for sure?

=====
From karl@pemail.net:
The amount of detail within this and image 2 suggest that this was created as a
major project, outside of the competition, and looks like an advert for a new
building. However without any words to describe the picture I have to assume
that it was done in the spirit of the competition

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
We have pondered over this image also for some time. Either the program the
image was created in is exceptionally good or the submitter of this image is
being very naughty. As we can not decide because of the lack of text file with
a description of how the image was made we have given the benefit of the doubt,
and given 10 for tech points.
If we have done this image an injustice by doing so, perhaps the submitter of
the image, will spare a thought for the voters in the future and submit a
proper text file so we have the information needed to make a decision on the
technical quality.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
I wish you said something in the text file.
This scene is amazingly photo-realistic.
What software did you use?


=====
From r@client836b.globalnet.co.uk:
Notable for modelling


=====
From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net:
Even more off topic.  Still not enough information to judge.  This comment by
clem@dhol.com.