===== From cyber.mage@mailexcite.com: Another one?! ===== From agage@mines.edu: See my comments on your other two images regarding giving a better description. This is getting sad -- so many beautiful images getting bad scores for lack of any kind of documentation. If I had any idea what kind of tools or rendering software were used, I could rate this image better, but as it is, I can only assume you did no work and that some high-priced rendering package did it all instead. ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: Very good modelling - I like the walls. The sky looks a bit like a darkened daylight image, though. ===== From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu: The only thing dragging down this image is the total lack of a text file. ===== From sanna@censa3.polito.it: It is quite strange the illumination since the sun seems to be high in the sky ===== From dormammu@erols.com: Again: Why such a short TXT file? Give some detail. Good texture on what I assume is a castle. You could've used some clouds in the sky, or stars or something. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: We have pondered over this image also for some time. Either the program the image was created in is exceptionally good or the submitter of this image is being very naughty. As we can not decide because of the lack of text file with a description of how the image was made we have given the benefit of the doubt, and given 10 for tech points. If we have done this image an injustice by doing so, perhaps the submitter of the image, will spare a thought for the voters in the future and submit a proper text file so we have the information needed to make a decision on the technical quality. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: This is a very good image, but please, write something in your text file. How did you model this? What software did you use? ===== From cfusner@enter.net: The lens flare effect on the moon looks wrong for a night scene (almost as if it were originally a sun that has been post-processed out to make this a night shot). But although the roofing texture needs shingles the architechture is quite impressive. ===== From r@client836b.globalnet.co.uk: Notable for modelling ===== From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net: Borderline on topic. No story. Still not enough information. This comment by clem@dhol.com.