===== From agage@mines.edu: Interesting and novel. The camera effect is pretty good. The image could use better anti-aliasing, and maybe would have seemed more appropriate with some focal blur (so thing are just a bit fuzzy...) ===== From jaime@ctav.es: Very nice use of camera normal! (also, one of the few real uses for that!) ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: Great idea! I like the distorted camera. Some extra details on the models could have been nice, though. ===== From dormammu@erols.com: Very interesting picture -- made me laugh. More detail on how you did the wavy bit would be interesting. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: An original idea carried out fairly well. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Oh, man, I get dizzy just looking at this. Nice sense of distortion. I need some coffee. ===== From djconnel@flash.net: The camera filter is a nice touch, but you really should describe your techniques in your entry... it is part of the package on which "tech" is judged. The scene is nicely done, but would be perhaps even better if some more attention were played to texturing -- the lamps and grass, especially. The path is well done, though. ===== From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net: Clever idea. Good sky. Light posts need more detail. Image needs antialiasing. This comment by clem@dhol.com.