=====
From spanky@wpi.edu:

Nice apple ;)
=====
From firestar@eskimo.com:
Being a Physics major I found the use of a famous physics formula to be a
very ammusing interpretation of the subject nature (by our understanding of
it).  I have one question though, how does E
=====
From ewgr@abaddon.globalnet.co.uk:
I'm not too sure, but try scaling your image map next time.

=====
From buck@cs.byu.edu:
I really like your apple--the stem in particular is great.  The scene
itself is pretty empty, though, and the connection between an apple and
"e=mc2" is pretty vague (or perhaps I'm just clueless?  always a
possibility...)

=====
From ingo.guenther@netcologne.de:
Next time please consider that we have to vote on _all_ pictures entered
for the contest. So, if you're too busy to work on an image, just skip
it instead of sending 'something'.
Regarding the image map on a blob: This depends on where you put the
texture definition into the blob definition.

Bye,
   Ingo.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Not a bad apple model!
but...
1. less JPEG compression needed
2. a LOT more substance needed.

=====
From uwe.post@gmx.de:
Sure you didn't mean F=mg ?

=====
From fisher2@pobox.upenn.edu:
For so few elements in your scene I think it would have helped to make the
E=MC2 & apple bigger to fill up more of the empty space.  And maybe have
something other than a plain black background.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
E=mc2 and a pixellated apple?  What does this mean?