=====
From rotht@televar.com:
The girl's hair is too transparent.  Nice scenery though...

=====
From jamez@xover.ml.org:
jus nature wanted!
=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Should have had more grass blades. Otherwise, excellent work.
=====
From d97ta@efd.lth.se:
i don't see the connection to nature.
great sky, with the puffy clouds.
the grass is a bit thinly spaced (i know, i know... primitive count would
skyrocket :), especially near the camera.

=====
From ewgr@abaddon.globalnet.co.uk:
I particularly liked the way the mountain peak was lit stronger than below. Also
the girls skirt really seems to be blowing in the wind that took her kite. I
think your clouds could do with a little work (rotation?), otherwise lovely
image.

=====
From ulf.schreiber@gmx.net:
Ever heard of rand()? 
(Oh - that was not nice ;)
But still impressive algorithmic trees for using only the possibilities
of pov-internal creation.

=====
From buck@cs.byu.edu:
Good job!  Great placement and modelling of objects.  The girl is well
done.

The grass seems a bit sparse, tho, and the pine tree is pretty "regular"
(ie, not a lot of randomness to it).

Well done!

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice details. Liked specially the wind consistency.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Nice use of the wind! However, the grass clearly is a bit sparse, and
the girl appears a bit stiff.

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
That tree looks like it could reach into the heavens...

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Very clever way to make grass.  (Although it reminds me of a closeup of hair on
skin, or the sea floor.  See Robert Fremin's "Octopus" in this competition). 
And nice blending between the "near" and "far" grass.
Good sense of breezy wind with the kite, string, grass, and clothes.