=====
From scooby@pld.com:
The motion blur looks very good.  Please keep working on it for all the rest of
us.

=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
neat idea but it didn't hold my attention very long, maybe as an animation...

=====
From nx@chez.com:
Nice programming, but motion blur looks weird probably because of the textures
you used for spheres.





=====
From mwhite@concourse.net:
Nice use of focal blur

=====
From gmol@my-dejanews.com:

Nice blur..
=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
Nice job on the motion blur. I gave a fairly high tech score.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good title!

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
A good entry for the water round :).

The motion blur is a nice touch.  Impressively done....

Still, the image needs a bit more to make it really effective.  for example,
why is nothing visible in the background?  Shouldn't there be a "cloud"
visible from distant molecules?

Dan


=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
I love it!  There is a 3-D IMAX/OMNIMAX movie called "We are born of
Stars" that has something similar... I'd love to see it again some day. 
I think it was Japanese.

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
The motion blur effect is very convincing.  I understand that the used 
process require a simple scene, but even then : the choosen colors are
quite
harsh, some nuances would be better; while using spheres, which are quick
to 
render, you could have made more complex elements; there seems to be only
two locations for atoms : foreground and background, it looses some sens of
3D
space.  Finally, the motion blur effect would have been much more
impressive
if some atoms were very fast and some others very slow.


=====
From r@dt027n86.maine.rr.com:
The motion effects on this is an interesting touch. The only suggestion I might
make is to change the background Iknow the blue does stand out aganst it but I
think it could use a little color or motion to draw intrest to the scene.
Notable for originality