===== From scooby@pld.com: Most original and likely the smallest. Personally, I don't care for artistic statements or displays of angst. ===== From roth@ens.ascom.ch: Not only the smallest but also the fastest rendered picture ever. ===== From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com: Most unique interpretation of theme. I salute your effective use of simple objects to make your point. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: The spammer strikes again! ===== From nx@chez.com: Aouch ! How to rate your pic/pix ? Dunno. Disturbing (so you succeed). I will probably think about it every day until the voting deadline... ===== From tlyons@gnn.com: hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ===== From gmol@my-dejanews.com: NIce try, just a bit of detail (perhaps a monitor with a single pixel lit) would have made it clever... ===== From ewgr@abaddon.globalnet.co.uk: You also get a plus vote for making me laugh, I realise i should not let that particular emotion sway my judgement but I am, after all, only human. ===== From skywise@fix.net: For being a "joke image" like the all-black night images, this one DID have a bit more behind it... Just a bit, though. Personally, I never had a problem with the "joke images", but some people do, so I just wanted to make sure there was at least one comment in here that wasn't at all harsh... ===== From bobfranke@halcyon.com: You broke my WinVote. Gave you a high number for concept otherwise low. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Here are my comments . for this image! ===== From djconnel@flash.net: AWESOME!!!! I get to test my image size algorithm :). Pre-deduction : tech = 20 (perfectly rendered!) Image size addition : 2 int(0.1 + ln (pixels/48000)) = -26 points Dan ===== From ekennedy@voyager.net: So twisted, it's brilliant. :-) ===== From 101741.541@compuserve.com: I don't like the color ! ;) Well, in fact, you could have pushed the concept further and choose the color using symbolic values in rgb : golden section, geometrical property,... or a top-model mensurations : 86-45-86 (in cm !!) ===== From r@peso.ntu.edu.sg: Notable for originality ===== From r@client8788.globalnet.co.uk: Notable for originality ===== From r@dial-up46.webbernet.net: But how about *percentage* of wrong pixels? Could be in trouble there.... This comment by clem@dhol.com.