=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Not related to topic...
=====
From chris@68k.org:
Good idea, but I only see a dagger.  If it were bloody, I might be able to
understand the "mystery" part of the image.

=====
From skywise@fix.net:
You REALLY would have benefited from a better looking dagger... Everything else
in the image looks great.

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
Nice spin on the topic.  Although I only see a couple of elements of a mystery
or is finding them the mystery.  I would like to see a magnifying glass that
actually works.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Certainly doesn't look like a typical Bryce image!

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Wow -- this is one of the best Bryce images I have seen!

The paper is excellently done, and the globe is a nice piece of work!

The scene is a step away from being at the winning level, but is
still an excellent piece of work.  It's just missing that little bit which
make the winning entries so striking.

One small weakness is it relies too heavily on the paper to convey
the topic.  The one item appears to be a letter opener rather than a dagger,
and there are no signs of crime or even any unsolved problems.

Still, it is quite well done.

Dan

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
Good concept. But it looks to me as a compilation of Bryce's weaknesses: the
magnifier and knife have no shadows on the paper, the paper has black, linear
limits (and not irregular)...