=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
I don't 'like' this pic.  But I'm not supposed to like it.  Very effective
at giving the viewer a startle.  Excellent blending of the skull into the
earth.  And the fog adds the right touch of mystery.  My morbid side is
very pleased.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Off-topic.
=====
From nx@chez.com:
Oooogh, you were in a real bloody mood ! Little bit disappointed with the smoke
effect, but good textures and "face" shape.







=====
From skywise@fix.net:
Great image all around, artistically great, technically amazing, and very
original... The only one I gave straight 20s 
this time around.

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
The lighting of this image bears no resemblance to your description.  I see no
evidence of a flash light.  Also with no information of what software was used
an how it was used, I have no choice but to give a very low tech score.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Skull looks realistic, except the rounded chin..
I wonder what renderer / modeller you used?

=====
From kosh@nesys.com:
Cool image, but the text file needs more info.
Can't rate on technicals, don't even know what renderer was used.



=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Your txt file is incomplete -- what software did you use?

The image, though is excellent!  It is quite striking.  But without
more detail on how it was created, it can't receive maximum scores
in tech.

Still, in artistic especially, I give it a very high rating.

Dan

=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
very nicely done - a strikingly original image when compared to others
from this round.

=====
From wozzeck@club-internet.fr:
Burp!
(is it rendered? renderer? why not 800x600?)


=====
From r@cust193.webbernet.net:
Interesting negative interpretation of the topic.  Looks very good.  The ground
texture has a lot of nice detail.  It is hard to judge tech without knowing
more about what software and techniques you used.  I like the lighting.  This
comment by clem@dhol.com.