=====
From witoslaw@kki.net.pl:
The idea is good but realisation a little worse. The iceberg is VERY strange.
=====
From prizog@hotmail.com:
9/10 of an iceberg is underwater.  But good for a first image.  keep at it. 
=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Nice job--did that iceberg in the foreground just fall in from overhead?
it looks topheavy, and the waves are centered on it. It looks smooth, as if
perhaps its melting--you might try adding some drops coming down (and perhaps
also rippling the water as they fall in).
=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
I like the japanese feel the scene has, but if you hadn't told me there was
seaweed
in the water I would have thought the water was just green.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Everything is of low quality, looks like thrown together in a few minutes. 
=====
From amason@cs.uct.ac.za:
I like this image, nice composition.
right hand berg is a bit hard to see, but fine.
waves look a bit unlikely for the sea.
sea looks quite shallow.
iceberg is a strange shape ;)

=====
From justin@scpmcs.org:
For a first image not bad at all. :)

=====
From paul.flanzy@jouy.inra.fr:
for a first picture it seems good . If you are learning povray just have a look
on interior and media and have a lot of fun



=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
The iceberg in the has far too smooth a surface (ever seen a real berg?) and a
strange coloring. I'm not sure the effect that icebergs melt fastest at the sea
surface would cause such a shape. More likely the overhanging parts would fall
down becoming small icebergs themselves.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Best of the Iceberg images, but before reading it, I thought the seaweed were
seals cavorting in the water...

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Original and certainly right-on-topic.  Serene.  Interesting
not-quite-symmetrical technique.  Good job!

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
That's a lot better than my first IRTC entry.  Blobs are good for asymmetric
objects; you might want to look at those next.