=====
From manorton@tcnet.net:
800x600!  Prety good for free version of Bryce.  The light needs work
though, and so does the structure of the rock formations.

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Wonderful caverns--it would be great to stick a canoe on this underground river
and animate through the journey.
=====
From amason@cs.uct.ac.za:

like it. the depth is nice.
=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I'm left to wonder what lights the scene in places where the lantern does not
shine. Also, the lantern light looses too little intensity with grosing
distance, usually the falloff would be baout 1/(r^2) with r=distance.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
The improbable lighting hurts the technical score.It would have been better to
work out a more 'natural' solution to the problem.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very nice composition and concept. And a true bravery to attempt a cavern.
I only can disagree with the light color: I think a golden-yellowish light
must have worked better.

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
There's a bit of graininess in the image, maybe due to the fog function.
The lighting needs some work, as the exterior of the lamp seems overly
bright in contrast to the impact of it's own light on the surrounding area.
Quite a nice image though.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good gritty realism on the shoreline.
I wish the other light source only illuminated the background of the scene, and
not the foreground objects.