=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Really nice tie-fighter and water. The ridge in the background doesn't live
up to the same quality. Fog and other planet are well placed.
=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
 A little off of theme, but nicely done.  the modeling on the Tie is good, but
the 
electricity either needs some work, or some discretion.  The mountain range
looks
too centered, as though it's the only island around.

=====
From amason@cs.uct.ac.za:

doesn't seem to have too much to do with water ;) but I like it
anyway. decent composition
=====
From justin@scpmcs.org:
Sorry, but the relation of this is Water is a real stretch.

=====
From vogelap@email.uc.edu:
I like the water texture.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
quite a nice setting, but the lighting is a but dull. A moon that can be seen
through haze is unlikely to have parts that are darker than the haze.
The water appears to reflect a very low-resolution environment map.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Well, I'm a sucker for star wars. The water is well done. The major flaw I can
see is the 'shorting' on the TIE fighter, it needs to glow or something to make
it seem like electricity. As it is it looks like stripes painted on.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice composition. Perhaps the water is too reflective. But, this is earth?
and... this is water or a mercury ocean? :)

=====
From Varyk@aol.com:
you either need to fade out the moon before you get to the dark parts, or=
 you need to include a shadow of the rest of the sphere.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Not bad.  I like the "shorting out"-effect.


=====
From r@spider-th084.proxy.aol.com:
This image has its moments, I like the way water i present in different ways.


=====
From r@tk156239.telekabel.at:
Notable for textures, modelling


=====
From r@tk156239.telekabel.at:
The water high-field is very good, also the starship-model