===== From jknepley@chisp.net: The figures look too static, like 3 mannequins floating in water. There appear to be two planes of water, one on the top, one on the bottom. ===== From agage@csee.usf.edu: Wish my hair did that under water... ===== From jerry@hoboes.com: The water looks weird: it looks like they're in some sort of "water cave", with a water surface above them and a water surface below them. ===== From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com: Nice theme, and oneof the better uses I've seen of those Poser-people. It doesn't really look like we're underwater, caustics and media effects would have helped. the ladies hair should be flowing. ===== From amason@cs.uct.ac.za: looks like the scene is underwater but has water as a floor? ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: Hmm, well, you did not tell us _how_ you did the models and the image (except some words about Poser and Bryce), but rather that you converted them. ===== From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu: Rivers don't have reflective water surfaces on the _bottom_. The figures look plastic. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: I'm afraid I cannot understand the text file. Did you render the image in Bryce, or POV-Ray? The IRTC is not a POV-Ray-specific competition, so why discuss the "non-POV origin"? Interesting interpretation. I wish the gold was casting a yellow light on the figures. ===== From peter@table76.demon.co.uk: The riverbed looks like a second water surface, rather than like sand or whatever.