===== From jknepley@chisp.net: This is a good model of a glass, but it needs to live somewhere. ===== From agage@csee.usf.edu: Simple, but the water texture is good; I figured someone would use this idea. ===== From witoslaw@kki.net.pl: I have seen this pic before. I think I even have it on my CD. ===== From jerry@hoboes.com: Nice glass. The water droplets? look kind of like glass beads; perhaps they could be made less perfect. (Assuming that they really are meant to be water droplets.) ===== From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com: I like the glass, and the water, but I've never seen a gold spoon before. perhaps a normal steel spoon would have left attention on the glass and water more. ===== From jasondinger@hotmail.com: the texture of the spoon is odd, and that's a good thing. i really like the droplets of water. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Very cool. Simplicity greatly adds to this image! ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: The refraction and transparency of the water and the glass itself looks like "the real thing", but I find the texture of the spoon and the table rather disturbing. For that simple a scene: really well done. ===== From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu: Ok entry, but not _everything_ has to have some sort of bozo pigment...is the spoon made of alabaster or something? ===== From arcana@sinbad.net: Very realistic scene, except that the spoon's bowl seems very thick. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Good view of refraction. The water is quite dark, though.