=====
From manorton@tcnet.net:
Very nice lighthouse model.

The rest of the image however looks kind of flat.  And for some reason the
shadows on the row boat do not seem to match with the rest of the scene.
But all and all I would say this is a good scene

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
The flying bird looks like a cut-out. Nice detail elsewhere in the scene,
especially the house and boats. The rocky point surrounding the lighthouse
looks a bit too synthetic for the rest of the scene.
=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
The lighthous is great! And so is the cabin.  I think the grassy beach would
have
been better.  And there are no waves in the ocean.  There appears to be some
clouds
in front of the lighthouse; either the sky is awfully low or the lighthouse is
really tall!  A good effort.  And seagulls look goofy in real life anyway.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
The light source seems to be somewhat too low: the underside of one wing of th
flying seagull is lit, but not the other wing. The textures are too strong an
not too realistic, and I think the shape is far too smooth.
I agree that the ocean to the left looks very nice.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Texturing on the rocks makes them seem a lot smaller than their scale in the
picture would indicate.

=====
From Varyk@aol.com:
nice image.  Hope it's high tide!  Lighthouse is particularly cool.

=====
From djohnston@iname.com:
Very nice lighthiouse and rocky shore. The sand doesn't have a griny look to
it, but other than that, a very strong entry.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
I'm in awe.  I didn't know RDS could create such fine images.  It proves the
point yet again: it's not the rendering tool, it's the artist that counts.

A few of the textures bother me though, particularly on the sand, the big rocks,
and the flying gull.