===== From witoslaw@kki.net.pl: The bottle texture needs improvement ===== From jerry@hoboes.com: Since I haven't seen the commercial I don't really know what's going on. What's in the bottle? Seems dark for water. Great job with the stones! ===== From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com: The stone look good refracted through the water like that. the water seems particularly blue-green, an odd effect for water that shallow, but I accept artistic licence. The text on the bottle seems pixellated. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Sloppy texturing of label on bottle prevented you from getting a 20-20-20! ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: What's "naterial"? ===== From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu: The only major problem with this image is the clear pixelation of the bottle label. ===== From jaime@ctav.es: Perhaps laks a bit more reflections to get more realism. Anyhow, I liked it very much, especialy the rolling stones placement. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: The stones are nicely varied in size, shape, and texture. But some of them seem to be floating! ===== From Martial@Biosys.net: Oh c'est tres beau! I like the simply feeling. Good works! ;-) ===== From ulf.schreiber@gmx.net: This one is one of the best demonstrations of the limits of only normal-mapped water: Just look at the edge between bottle and water: There just aren't any waves! Massive amount of stones, with an impressive amount of different textures that still fit together ===== From r@138.102.96.24: Notable for lighting, textures ===== From r@tk156239.telekabel.at: Notable for composition, textures ===== From r@tk156239.telekabel.at: A very good image. The stone-textures and models are perfect, also the water and the waves. The image map on the bottle could be better (looks like the resolution was too low)