=====
From manorton@tcnet.net:
Dont use IRTC as a way to get points, it wont.  Your mountians do not look
natural.  but I do like the rocks inthe water.  The waterfall is cool
though.

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Good pier. Nice foaming water. The hills look kind of like the kind of cardboard
you find in egg cartons. A little work there could do wonders for the image;
artistically, I'm not sure that centering the camera on the waterfall is the
best choice.

Um... does the woman have a broken arm? :*)
=====
From Sean_Hamilton@amrcorp.com:
I like the mist from your waterfall.

=====
From vogelap@email.uc.edu:
Good lighting, sterile mood, but nice technique.

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
What do you mean by "circus"?
The water does not really look like the real thing, it is too greyish,
especially where it laps at the opposite shore. Viewed at that shallow angle it
should be far more reflective, but like this it looks more like fog.

=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
HF textures are out of scal;e, obligatory naked Poser chick...

=====
From arcana@sinbad.net:
First, each plank on the bridge has the exact same texture. If you'd tossed
in a randomizer to rotate/translate the pattern for each one it would have
helped. The water looks pretty good, but may need a bit more depth
darkening to show the contrast between the deep water under the bridge and
the shallow water off to the left. Overall, a nice scene.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Nicely done.  Good effort.  The figure and the bridge add a lot to the picture,
but the balloon is gratuitous, completely unnecessary.