=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
I like the plane and height field for the desert.  The 
image can be improved by just continuing to add those 
small details that make all the difference, and of course 
take time.  The columns need more detail and some 
markings on the plane will help.

=====
From caleb@chemeng.uct.ac.za:
Very nice - visually appealing

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Interesting, although a little barren.  The distant sands are good, the nearby
pillar textures are not.  Nice modelling on the airplane.  An off-center
airplane would help the composition.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
I like the plane.  However, the scene still needs a lot of 
work.

The texture of the sand isn't optimized, for example.... it 
looks like plastic.
Additionally, there is nothing that shows "first 
encounter" here... the plane
is at extremely low altitude, and appears to be flying 
past random stuff.


In general, the best thing is to focus on textures..... they 
are what really make
excellent images work well.

=====
From east103@dialaccess.com:
Nice  plane.

=====
From dnash@umich.edu:
I like the overall idea, and the airplane + desert, but I think the columns
could be a bit better -- right now, they look almost polished, when I'd expect a

1000+ year old ruin in a desert to be weatherbeaten.   Also, I can't recognize
the
statue's head as such.


=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Liked your Fokker Triplane. I hope he has some speed 
on otherwise he is about to pancake into the sand 
dunes!

=====
From blaineholmes@hotmail.com:
I like your plane.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Very good pushing of the topic. You mixed very well what you wanted to do with
the theme of that round. And it is an original one...