=====
From denny1@home.com:
Oooh, love the broken shells.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Very artistic although the colours would not be my pick.
Great combination. It is hard to see the geometry of this world and I like
this.
Baby dragons are a bit too much identical to one another, some more tweeking
would have greatly helped : i.e. the tail always seems to be bent the same way,
except maybe once, same remark for the wing position and the parent's tongues.
On the technical end of things, you're asking about the difference and a clipped
object. A clipped object by definition looses the meaning of inside and outside
since they would reach some place. So CSG has no sense with clipped objects, it
is the same problem as for Bezier patches or meshes, how can POV determine what
is inside and what is outside for the purpose of CSG ?
The baseline for CSG is to be able to make the distinction between inside and
outside and from there construct addition/substraction of objects.

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Nice modelling work, interesting texture on the adult dragons' snouts.  The
colours were a little overwhelming at first.

=====
From houston.graphics@iname.com:
I like the baby dragons, the colours are a bit .... colourful !, apart from
that, I like it.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Good concept.

=====
From gshaw@monotix.co.za:
Bit too much colour. Modelling nice.

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
Bold and beautiful image.  I really like the use of bright 
but sophisticated textures.  Excellent media work.  The 
bird claws on the dragonets are an interesting and well 
done detail.  This is easily the most "magical" image I 
have seen in a long time. Very well done.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Colourful and well detailed. Can't see any suggestions, except maybe the broken
eggs don't look realistic... need to study real eggshells and try to get that
look right.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
Lots of tech stuff here but all tossed in for no obvious reason.