===== From denny1@home.com: The radiator is well designed, looks very real. The TV is a bit too dark to see clearly. The magazine splayed out on the floor is nice, but I don't think it would have stayed with its spine that far up in the air. It would have settled much closer to the ground. There is a lack line tracing the floor under and around the nightstand, which I cannot identify. Not sure what was intended. Are two of the books on the stand floating? ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: No penalties assessed for second entry because it is so different! ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: Very interesting concept. Poor lighting. I know this is night, but that is not good enough an excuse for plain darkness. A picture is meant to be seen. ===== From shipbrk@gate.net: Great concept! ===== From bobfranke@halcyon.com: Nice recursive idea. Good marks for concept. ===== From houston.graphics@iname.com: I like the idea, the moonlight (?) reflecting off the back wall, I feel, should have been cast over the floor as well, but thats my opinion. Nice picture though. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: Good concept. ===== From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au: Fantastic concept, and fairly well executed. The "plasma" around the bubble looks a bit solid... something more halo-ey might have looked better. But overall nicely done. ===== From jull43@ij.net: meaningless shapes ===== From r@209.155.62.50: Notable for composition, originality