=====
From denny1@home.com:
The green thing is... interesting.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
A pity POV does not do real caustics, it would have been wonderful there.
Again one of those much too dark compositions.
The central element is nice, but the lighting of the rest of the scene is rather
poor.

=====
From shipbrk@gate.net:
Good job -- and that green blob looks really cool.

=====
From houston.graphics@iname.com:
I like Eschers work and this captures the look well, however the detail on
the walls is lost,  another light source might have helped, or possibly
radiosity ?  I like the green shape but it looks too big, IMHO.

=====
From tlyons@gnn.com:

too dark,can't make out enough to see what it is 8-(
=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Very good. Good concept.

=====
From gshaw@monotix.co.za:
Thingin middle looks like twisted green plastic. Adds a new feel to an old
idea

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Impressive recreation of Escher's drawing. Not sure about the green thing
though.
The hatstand is a good idea and the Newton's cradle is inspired. Where is the
little bird thing though? Yeah, the green thing is really a mistake I think.
I'd remove that, add the bird from the Escher original, maybe refine the marble
texture a bit, and add one or two more bits of office equipment - that'd be a
really good image.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
meaningless shapes.