===== From sammy@cube.net: The Planet is slightly too visible. It looks like it's hovering underneath the clouds. But i like the picture. Nice 'alien' quality to the metal. bye, Sammy ===== From seayt01@mail.mgc.peachnet.edu: Very nice, especially given the primative shapes you used to create it. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Nice water, nice sense of scale. ===== From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com: Too dark again. ===== From shipbrk@gate.net: Very nice, like the gloomy ambience. Is the Sentinel II modelled after the "Sentinel Major" in Stewart Cowley's "Spacecraft: 2000 to 2100 AD"? ===== From houston.graphics@iname.com: I like the Sentinel, but the ships to the right just don't sit well, the texture looks too dull compared to the other ships. Also the water looks great at a distance, but up close I think there should have been something else to mask it. ===== From tlyons@gnn.com: needs more of a focal point. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: Fits the topic perfectly. ===== From gshaw@monotix.co.za: Water looks like oil. Otherwise very nice ===== From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au: I think I have the same book as you... with a painting of these ships in it. Still, a nice image, well executed. ===== From jull43@ij.net: Just because if floats as do most alien buildings, that does not make it interesting to see one more floating building.