===== From sshaw@fas.harvard.edu: Even with the explanation, I am not sure that I see the connection between the title of the image and the image itself. The knowledge about the heirarchy of the Roman army is evident, but the different offices described in the text file aren't as evident to me in the image. ===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: The lighting is pretty good, as are the bricks in the lower-right corner, but the textures need more work. Human skin is very awkward to do good, but the horses would look better with more highlights. Horse fur actually is pretty shiny, perhaps {specular .5 roughness .1}. ===== From jerry@hoboes.com: Perhaps not enough obliviousness on the dicers, and not enough anger on the commander to justify the title? Nice story, though. ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Confusing relation of title to overall story detracts from theme. Written description is otherwise good. I prefer a style of construction which is either entirely cartoony or entirely photo-realistic. ===== From jull43@ij.net: I see an old army, not an A Bomb explosion and after searching for the joke, I might have found it. I see very regular, assembled ranks making the gambling scene incongruous. I also see the ranks exteremly regular, regular beyond reality, a little randomness in the spacing perhaps? ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: Interesting idea and quit nice layout. Unfortunately humans and horses do not consist of spheres and cylinders. Spoils the image for me. ===== From tlyons@gnn.com: A-bomb? First courtmarshall maybe (but then again we dont judge the titles) ===== From jaime@ctav.es: Very nice detail. Hard work, but the result looks very nice. Liked the composition and the point of view. The only BUT is the texture for the road, which looks very flat. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: Good work. I especially like the uneven bricks in the lower right corner. Many of the colors are too intense for me. In spite of your attempt to vary the figures, they still seem like clones. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: Ambitious interpretation of the topic. ===== From 101741.541@compuserve.com: Good setup, but I wish the viewer was more implied in the scene. (but you seem to say that it's based on an existing picture ?) ===== From r@servlotus.hdv.mairie-nancy.fr: Notable for modelling, lighting, originality, composition, textures ===== From r@pluto.icom-solutions.com: Notable for originality