===== From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se: + I like the little glow around the metal objects, and the dripping milk is well-made, too. - The faces look a bit stiff, perhaps. ===== From jerry@hoboes.com: Cleo and her maidservant are extremely 'stiff' looking; also, there ought to be some oreos with her in the bath, I mean, what good is milk without oreos? :*) ===== From gregj56590@aol.com: Nice composition. Shouldn't gold be reflective? ===== From jull43@ij.net: If I study it, the perspective appears correct in some manner but at first glance it appears all wrong outside the "window." Was it a wide angle lens or something? Although the "texture" of the textures appears reasonable (save for too large seams in the obelisks) the colors are too similar for my tastes. Everything too gold/yellow, even the browns for the tree trunks. Frankly there was no reason to work Cleopatra into it. ===== From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de: Cleopatra had a very finely drawn and small face, not the brute that you showed. I also wonder if it is neccessary to show bare breasts in this kind of competition. ===== From davidwilkinson@cwcom.net: A good try, but it is so difficult to get a realistic skin texture. ===== From ethelm@bigfoot.com: Very ambitious, quite effective. Her breasts are better looking than her face! ===== From 101741.541@compuserve.com: While her chest is.. err... attractive, she looks unhappier as possible; what about her nose ? ===== From bobfranke@halcyon.com: Is this the face of the queen who seduced Julius Caesar and Mark Antony'? This is a great start but I think Cleopatra_s face need to softened. The milk bath came out very well and I like the way you did the trunks of the palm trees.