=====
From sshaw@fas.harvard.edu:
In your comments, you hit what I noticed about this image.  The lander could use
more details.  The color and texture used for the foil looks good.

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
Good to see some more modern history.

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Shouldn't there be stars and such visible from the moon even in daylight? Also,
historically, there was more than one astronaut on the first manned landing.
=====
From jull43@ij.net:
It might be your worst, such false modesty ;), but 
interesting. Mainly the parts of the image don't qutie blend 
together. If the basic ground were a bit rougher that and 
the rocks would look as I remember the photos. 


=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Don't be so humble, I think this is quite  good image. Only thing that struck
me was the perfectly smooth space suit (I remember the Apollo suits being
wrinkled), and the discrepancy between the angles of incidence for the
sunlight on the moon and the earth. Compared to the distance from the sun,
moon and earth are basically in the same spot.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Not so bad at all.  Truly historic.  Good lunar surface.  Good wide aspect
ratio.  Earth seems to be too-bright electric blue.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
A pretty good image. Definately History. The astronaut 
looks a bit monkey like.

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
The module seems complete and accurate;
be careful about a man's body proportions, even in 
astronaut
clothes ;)   And, I think (not 100% sure) that the 
shadows on the
ground should be mush sharper.

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
I wish my last minute entries looked that good.


=====
From r@98cab144.ipt.aol.com:
The astronaut looks a little funny to me. Other than that, pretty good image.
Notable for modelling, lighting, composition