=====
From sshaw@fas.harvard.edu:
I think that I would have preferred the image without the robotic "bug"
on the stalk.  Though it does provide constrast, I find it somewhat out
of place.  I don't know if this is a result of the image conversion to
jpg or not, but it is hard to see just what is going on with the island,
especially in the lower right corner.  I like the idea, though; the blimp
in the background helped me figure out what I was looking at when I first
pulled up the image.

=====
From brendthess@aol.com:
The ship contrails need some work.  Even where the image implies that the ships
are turning, the contrails are straight and too cylindrical.

=====
From nijman@nmtrix.com:
Nice leaves, why did you include all the other models, they are not an
enrichment to the picture.


=====
From johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu:
Love it! That caterpillar like crawler is GREAT. The texture on the stalks is
lacking, though.

=====
From somers@w-link.net:
I like the lighting!

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Obviously a lot of hard work here, but the result is rather jumbled.

=====
From autumn@sinbad.net:
Well conceived idea! One thing. How would the bean 
stalks survive in the rarified atmosphere near the orbital 
satelite?

=====
From clem@dhol.com:
Very clever twist on the beanstalk concept.  I am also 
impressed by your clever means of creating the 
beanstalks.  The leaves are excellent, but the beanstalk 
texture needs to be more defined and stronger looking.  
Some normal adjustments would help.  The blimp is a nice 
idea.  Why pots?  Can you imagine the size of the root 
system these things would need?  The crawler is good, but 
needs a bit more detail and perhaps another joint in the 
legs.  Well done.

=====
From sdevet@istar.ca:
I really like the idea, and the composition of the image is both
interesting, and bizarre. The scene looks a little flat, though.. I
think that some radiosity or area lights would have been a great
addition.


=====
From file:
Pretty.