=====
From brendthess@aol.com:
Let there be global warming....
  Ummmm.... the topic was supposed to be unbelievable, not 'taj mahal'.  Did I
miss something?

=====
From nijman@nmtrix.com:
More info, did you made the model of the Tadj yourself otherwise the rating
above are too high


=====
From jgoeson@msn.com:
This picture has potential, but it seems unfinished.  Also, why is the Taj Mahal
considered unbelievable?  Stick with it.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Beautiful Taj Mahal, and the concept is good. Some explanation of how
this was done in the text file would be helpful. Vey nice sky.

=====
From mriser@datacomm.ch:
Why not use the maximum width of 800 pixels?

=====
From autumn@sinbad.net:
Beautiful image, serene and uncluttered. An explanation 
of how it fit into the theme of "Unbelieveable" would 
have helped.

=====
From jull43@ij.net:
I do not see the topic Unbelievable here. But if you had held off, this 
would have fit the current topic perfectly. 

=====
From sdevet@istar.ca:
Wrong topic listing, but I think it's unbelievable anyways. Amazing
image! So simple, but so intense! Wheee! I love it!

=====
From peter@table76.demon.co.uk:
More information in the text file would be nice; I suppose this is an accurate
Taj Mahal in an ubelievably-flooded landscape?


=====
From file:
Lovely.