===== From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au: I think the most Unbelievable thing about this image is how close you got the man's face to resemble Hugo Weaving! Background detail excellent, the foreground could use some detailing.. dirt, litter... would make a good picture excellent. Not sure about the technique though... seems against the spirit of the comp somehow, but I guess if the software doe it you're okay. ===== From gmccarter@hotmail.com: I haven't seen the movie. What is "unbelievable" about this image? ===== From jull43@ij.net: Derivative but outstandingly so. Almost like you worked on the movie. ===== From sdevet@istar.ca: Nice pic, though a little plasticy. The man looks about right, as does the bullet trails, but the background is a bit bland. PS: 2010 is a better movie. ===== From file: Nicely done indeed. ===== From file: Rip offs don't score too high on the originality scale. ===== From file: Yea, its good i thought the picture really showed the movement of the agent as it was in the movie. I saw the movie and this looks just like what occured. I noticed that the path from the bullets, the image tended to be distorted a bit in the movie, and here all you did was just the cylinder with 10% visibility. But the picture is certainly good. Notable for lighting, modelling