=====
From clintona@ibm.net:
Great image! I love the sky and nighttime atmosphere. The water splash is a
little unconvincing.
=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
a little dark for my monitor

=====
From YaelParis@operamail.com:
very nice trees but you didn't mention how you created them. It seems that the
most work came from photos (sky and grass). Unfortunately the picture is too
dark to see the details of teh foreground.


=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
HEY! NO PHOTOGRAPHS! ;-)
=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Too bad it is so dark.  You miss a lot of the details

=====
From tom@tomandlu.force9.co.uk:
Lovely, but the light on the statue looks wrong.

=====
From CHRIS_DARCY@YAHOO.COM:
i liked this one to start with but then the more I looked at it the more the
trees looked strange. The lighting of the clouds just doesn't go with the
shadows (light low from right).

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
Nice population of trees, nice sky, nice water.
But even after altering the gamma in a major way the scene still looks too
dark.

Artistic.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Nice ambient. Water finish is superb, but the shape seems a bit strange. Very
well arranged, with a nice sun placement. Perhaps sun color is a bit "cold".

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Technical - good, very nice statue, query? nice attempt at the fountain water
Artistic - nice backdrop, path, statue but no flowers????
Theme - a garden yes it is, needs flowers around the fountain though

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Very high contrast in this image makes it hard to see the details. The trees
look
great and the grass good, but I feel you could have done more with the scene.
Some
flowers to add colour and break up the expanse of green at the bottom would help
a
lot.