=====
From bill@apocalypse.org:
I like the close-up shot better.

=====
From soulmates@gci.net:
This scene has great potential, but I think some more work 
is needed both on textures and lighting. This image cries 
out for radiosity. :{) Congratulations on your progress to 
date. 

=====
From YaelParis@operamail.com:
The models are good but the lightning isn't. There's no shadow and the texture
look strange and "synthetic"


=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Great concept but looks cartoonish

=====
From ianshumsky@hotmail.com:
You seem to have submitted the same image twice... As 
the text files are the same, I presume this was by 
accident, so I've voted the same for both images.

=====
From tom@tomandlu.force9.co.uk:
I liked the rather plain enviroment for this scene, but felt more
interesting lighting wouldn't be out of place.

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
OK, you submitted this work twice in a slightly different shape, I'll vote on
that one and dismiss the other as the other does not look as nice as a whole.

This is a very good concept and a pretty good composition. I like it.
Although the positioning of this 'stool' or support the garden in the room
seems
a bit odd. I would see it fit closer to the far corner, but granted, this would
make it harder to make a nice shot of it.
One of the better submissions.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Technical - very nice work on the plants, the little planter and table
Artistic - I kept wishing I could have a closer look at the little garden in the
planter!
Theme - a different but nice interpretation of the theme


=====
From file:
The over ambience of all surfaces here and the lack of shadows make it hard to
relate depth.