=====
From loomsbury@yahoo.com:
The stars could use some varying brightness, and maybe about 1/10th as many.  The reflection off of every piece of the city could be toned down a bit I think.  Seems like an expensive city.
=====
From pmccombs@hotmail.com:
Odd.  Stars need work.  Too busy.

=====
From scarmig@ohmss.com:
I'm sure others will say this too but the galaxy got very full of stars!  The number of sharp stars is really distracting from some of the other elements of your picture.  You have some really nice modelling on some of the buildings and structures and a good start modelling asteroids.  One thing I did in the past was to take a NASA style 360 degree picture of the stars and wrap inside of a sphere. Make the sphere hollow and huge and wrap it around your scene.  Just an idea!

=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
The city comes across as a massive structure (A good thing). The communication satallites are interesting and the spaceships add a nice touch to the scene. A few suggestions for improvment. Your stars would look a lot better if you varied the brightness. The shape of the Asteroid is nice but it needs more texture keep the towers they are cool!
=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
A little more Anti Aliasing is necessary to bring this image about.  Good concept.

=====
From jd@surveyor.in-berlin.de:
The starfield isn't working in any way, and the asteroids are veery fluffy

=====
From Stickgod01@aol.com:
Approximatly 12 times too many stars. Nice work on the satallite dish setup. Astroids look a little smooth and round.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Too many stars... take away from the scene.
=====
From mwsny001@mweb.co.za:
Very nice, but way too many stars. It distracts you from the main objects.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Most of the objects here are pretty nicely shaped.  I 
think the starfield is a bit overdone... maybe cut the 
number of stars in half?

=====
From tonyv@iafrica.com:
The dots (stars?) are a bit overdone.