=====
From loomsbury@yahoo.com:
I like the way most of this looks.  The street is too narrow though.  The grass is too flat.  I think the sky looks really nice.  Also, the lights on the building to the left look very good with their shadows on the wall.

=====
From pmccombs@hotmail.com:
Looking good.  Maybe brighten it a teeny bit.  Some of the text looks a little too computer-generated (the no trespassing notice, for example).  

=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
I love the clock very real looking. The night sky is nice too. (You are right about the stars though. The road seems to clean though. I would have expected more trash around the old building. The porch light on the older building I would expect to create a brighter circle of light. The grafitti initials look like they have a white outline around the blue letters. If that were removed the grafitti would look loads better.

=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Some of my higer marks this round.  Perhaps some cracks or potholes in the street where the construction trucks had done damage.

=====
From jd@surveyor.in-berlin.de:
Well, that's what I would call a BRIGHT clock dial

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Nice contrasting concept.  The far building looks a bit more naturalistic while the slum housing looks a bit artificial.... perhaps it is the textures.

=====
From tom@tomandlu.force9.co.uk:
I loved this. Beautiful.

=====
From tonyv@iafrica.com:
Lovely picture. Seems a little dark though.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Very nice image. Immaculate modelling, effective lighting (though I had to
boost the gamma a bit to see everything). A bit of concrete decay on the
kerbside and the road would have added further realism, but maybe this
doesn't really need it.