=====
From loomsbury@yahoo.com:
Way too cartoony for my taste.  At least, for the mountain looking so realistic.  The sky needs something besides just being blue.  Also, the lights need to look like lights instead of lines.

=====
From pmccombs@hotmail.com:
Nice maountains.  The other models are so-so.  The text on the picture is awful; this ruined it for me.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Wow! Very good use of slope maps! The multifractgal is also awesome. I must try 
to learn megapov NOW!

=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
I must say your mountains and sky are the best I've seen yet. If I didn't know better I'd say you put a real picture of a mountain in the background then pasted the city on to it. The city looks really nice but the fence ruins the affect making the city look sort of cartoonie (I blocked the red spheres on the fence and that made all the difference.) I think if you remove the red spheres it would add a lot of realism to the image.

=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Very realistic mountian snow

=====
From christophe.bouffartigue@libertysurf.fr:
Your mountains are great.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Spectacular snow scene.... the ship looked a bit out of place
=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
The mountains are breathtaking, and the sky works well, 
I think.  The city itself is nice but seems a little simplistic 
compared to the landscape.  I also think the logo in the 
bottom is a bit much, and detracts from the scene 
somewhat.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
The blue colouring of the shadows is very nice. The fence looks great, but
the buildings themselves seem like flat toy objects with lines on them, not
big buildings. Interesting concept, but it needs more city activity to be
shown somehow.


=====
From file:
The mountains are really good, I don't like the "city"
Notable for lighting, modelling