=====
From loomsbury@yahoo.com:
I like the the windows look, but it could have been done alot more simply I think.  A way that wouldn't take 55 hours to render would probably be preferable.  Also, the ground needs detail.

=====
From pmccombs@hotmail.com:
Nice effect.  The sky could use work.

=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Your windows are amazing it actually looks like little furniture. Leaves me wondering how you did it. The satelite picture I don't think adds a whole bunch to it. Originally I thought they were clouds. Your lighting worked well. That must have taken some SERIOUS tweaking. I think your picture worked fine w/o 'cars' and stuff. 



=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Sorry.  Without reading it I would have had no way of connecting this with SF area.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Nice camera postion.  Too much of the same thing though.
=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
Not bad from a technical and conceptual standpoint, but 
just too regular and repetitious for my tastes.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Interesting idea, but I would like to see more done with it. The background
is a little too fuzzy to recognise without the text file. What would really
help is some flying cars or something zipping around - something to indicate
the masses of people who must live here, giving the city its character.
Without that it's just a set of floating blocks.


=====
From file:
I like the colors
Notable for originality